Friday, 10 October 2008

Gosnells CEO raises consultant threat


as posted here back in March 2000

8-March-00 Written by Noel Dyson

GOSNELLS City Council CEO Simon Holtby has found a way to make himself unpopular with consultants.

As part of his study to finish the first Doctor of Business Administration ever completed at Curtin University, Dr Holtby examined innovation and the screening of ideas.

The text books say the criteria for screening ideas apply to all industries.

However, Dr Holtby found this was not the case. He determined that for three different industries, three different sets of criteria applied.

Hence, those consultants promoting a black box solution face redundancy.

Dr Holtby said he found industries had to develop their own innovation criteria.

He argues that some good ideas are not necessarily good within an industry.

“For example, what if a food manufacturer invented the television?” Dr Holtby asked.

“The TV is a good idea but it is not compatible with food manufacturing.

“It doesn’t mean the company should discard the idea.

“It could spin off a new division to deal with it or it could patent the technology and sell or licence it to somebody else.”

Dr Holtby has shown a strong interest in innovation throughout his career.

He began his working life as a civil engineer with British Rail before spending time in the energy industry in Tasmania and WA, finishing as marketing manager for Western Power.

Dr Holtby said his appointment to Gosnells was his first foray into local government.

Since he took the helm at Gosnells, the council has embarked on a major restructuring of the city centre.

It also won the WA Municipal Association Best Practice for Innovation Award in 1999.

“When I came here the council indicated it wanted change,” Dr Holtby said.

“The town centre redevelopment came about from a survey that was innovative in itself.

“We were asking people to make trade off decisions about what they wanted for their city.

“As far as I know that approach has not been used in local government in Australia,” he said.

as posted here back in March 2000

Court penalty for ignoring clean-up orders

as posted on COGsite

Owners of a property in Southern River have been fined a total of $2,100 after ignoring warnings from the City to stop storing commercial equipment in their yard.

After receiving complaints from nearby residents, the City’s Planning Compliance Officer inspected the property and issued a warning to the owners to remove the items within 14 days.

A subsequent site inspection revealed that the owners had made no attempt to remove the equipment and the City then proceeded with legal action.

Neither property owner responded to the prosecution notices nor did they appear at Armadale Magistrates Court on 24 September 2008 and legal representation was not made on their behalf.

The matter proceeded and each property owner was found to be in breach of the City’s Town Planning Scheme No.6 and Planning and Development Act 2005 for storage of commercial equipment on a residential property.

Each owner was fined $500 and ordered to pay $550 in costs.

A second prosecution is underway for a continuing offence at the property and this will go before the Magistrate on Wednesday 15 October.

City of Gosnells Planning and Sustainability Director Len Kosova said people in residential areas had a right to expect certain standards of amenity in their neighbourhood.

“This case serves as a good reminder that inappropriate activities will not be tolerated,” Mr Kosova said.

as posted on COGsite